1.
Systems-aware but commercially rational:
29% prioritise environmental impact, but won’t sacrifice health, taste, or quality. Over half pay a premium, only when trade-offs deliver future ecological gains and present value.
2.
Proof-demanding:
Scans for real ingredients and low-UPF signals first, then checks impact story. Wants credible proof that spending supports soil regeneration, fair labour
and localised resilience.
3.
Premium-willing with conditions:
72% will pay 15%+ more, but only when price signals structural change, not marketing. If the claim feels shallow, price becomes a deal-breaker.
